Twisted Clients…why they say goodbye!
Sales & Marketing for Professional Services & Strategic Issues

Twisted Clients...why they say goodbye!

April 24, 2013

by Tony Vidler

why financial planning clients leave the financial adviserCustomers leave us, and most times we blame someone else.  It gets called Churn, or Twisting.

Probably the most contentious issue in the financial services industry is the issue of clients moving advisers, or moving to different product suppliers.  Advisers and suppliers alike disparagingly refer to competitors as “twisters” and “churners”, with the overt insinuation that they have behaved unethically for moving a consumer to new products or relationships.

Interestingly, one rarely hears the industry talking about the customer motivation for moving firms or products though.

It is simplistic to assume that customers move only because they obtained a slightly cheaper price elsewhere.  It may be true that trimming a minor percentage in costs is a motivator for some, though it would not be true to suggest that this is the primary reason that customers move in the main.  If we accept that financial advice and financial products are considered complex, time-consuming, and a downright drag for most consumers, then it follows that they are not likely to go through all the hassle of switching everything to save just a few dollars a month.

So rather than vent about “twisters and churners” the question that any customer-centric professional services firm should be concentrating upon is:

“What makes our customers say goodbye?”

If I am permitted to be a little cynical for a moment, it is worth noting that replacement business is only called churning or twisting when it is going away from you. That is, when you are losing a client it is appropriate to label the competitor as unethical; yet; when it is coming to you, and your firm is picking up the client from your competitor, that is not twisting it seems.  A slight hypocrisy that is conveniently ignored most of the time.

Inevitably when there is little organic growth in the industry then competition for existing industry customers lifts in intensity, and there are advisers and firms alike who deliberately set out to take existing customers away from other industry participants as a means of growing their own business.  I would wager that this tactic exists in most business sectors most of the time, so it hardly seems aberrant behavior.  Of course, it DOESN’T seem to exist as an acceptable business tactic in the “Professions”.

Perhaps the financial services sector’s general behavior in this respect is evidence that financial advice not truly a profession at all as yet.  Perhaps.

Of course as we all know, one of the defining hallmarks of a profession is this simple concept of “putting the customers interests first”.  So let’s do that.  Let’s look at a superb piece of data that tells us what actually motivates customers to decide that despite the complexity and hassle factors, they are going to move firms and products.

Despite the fact that this research is focused upon financial planning clients, there are lessons for all financial advisers here.  The primary lesson is price is not suggested as a key reason for leaving an advisory firm.

Let’s be brutally clear here; the 2 standout reasons why clients move is because they lose trust in the advisory firm and they wanted more personal advice.  Clearly there is a backlash effect at work as well, in that when performance suffers then  clients become dissatisfied.  Well, that seems fair enough and we have to cop that one on the chin as that would be the same in any industry: if product or service does not perform satisfactorily then clients will become dissatisfied and leave.

For all that though, there is little doubt that maintaining trust and delivering personalized advice are the two key battleground issues for retaining clients.

This is where financial advisers have to win their own war for client support.

© 2013 Tony Vidler.  All rights reserved. All materials contained on this web site not otherwise subject to copyright of other parties are subject to the ownership rights of Tony Vidler.  Tony Vidler authorises you to make a single copy of the content herein for your own personal, non-commercial, use while visiting the site. You agree that any copy made must include the Tony Vidler copyright notice in full. No other permission is granted to you to print, copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, upload, download, store, display in public, alter, or modify the content contained on this web site.

Get financial adviser coach blog updates via email.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 308 other followers


Follow tonyvidler on

Comments (4)

  • I agree. If you continue to provide valued on-going personal service then the clients shouldn’t be tempted to move. Could I be as bold as to question whether ‘renewal commission for life’ is another culprit in causing churn? Does it let advisers become lazy and not provide the on-going service / reviews which helps provide value and retain client trust? If another adviser is invited to provide this service then the easiest way for the new adviser to get rewarded for the work done is to write new business elsewhere.

    But isn’t the then new commission for the valued existing adviser of 230% (or whatever) is a good reason to ensure the client is well serviced. But hey, who dangles the carrot, so who can take the blame?

    Just putting it out there!

    Cynical Observer
  • Leave a Reply