by Tony Vidler
The difficulty of using social media but remaining compliant as a financial adviser and not breaching any regulations seems to be a consistent objection to the use of social media by advisers. Various aspects of “compliance” are cited: the provision of best practice advice, privacy constraints, or legal responsibilities to a corporate stakeholder, and on it goes…
Yet using social media whilst remaining within the boundaries is actually a very simple thing to do.
….there…that was it…it is actually that simple.
The same rules, or guiding principles, that would apply to you when drafting a written advertisement in the local paper work when using social media as well. All the things that advisers are (or should be!) used to having to do in order to comply with marketing and advertising standards apply when using social media.
The reality is that all the customary things like not using bait advertising, or making false or misleading statements, or breaching privacy, simply extend to any advertising or marketing medium. No matter whether that is digital marketing or print advertising the same principles apply regardless.
Using social media does take things a step further in terms of the risk of a compliance breach though. By its very nature social media involves one-to-one interaction with consumers or clients, and conversations have a habit of naturally getting personal. That is one of the aspects of using social media which makes it such a powerful engagement tool; the ability to create one-to-one engagement with people that you want to have as clients.
It is highly likely therefore that at some point when using social media the conversation will turn to “what do you think I should do?”
Therein lies the danger. It FEELS like a personal conversation because it IS a personal conversation, but it is not a structured conversation and the adviser is fundamentally unable to control whether or not that conversation is opened up to other members of the public by the person they are talking to. Nor is it a secure environment. Perhaps you are not even talking to a genuine consumer….identity theft is a big thing now after all, and social media is a great place for fraudsters to engage with the unsuspecting to obtain identity details.
So when using social media one has to remember that its purpose is relationship building. It is about engagement and building a degree of empathy or trust. It is not to be used as an advice-delivery channel. One remains compliant if we remember
To say that one doesn’t intend to use digital communications as a marketing method for fear of non-compliance is the same as saying that one should not run client appreciation events due to the fear of making a compliance slip whilst talking to the audience.
It is the same deal.
The same principles of good behaviour, ethics, and how one provides personalised advice apply regardless of the marketing medium used. Take personal advice conversations offline, or out of any public forum, and bring them into the boundaries of the professional advice space.
It really is that simple.
© 2018 Tony Vidler. All rights reserved.
All materials contained on this web site not otherwise subject to copyright of other parties are subject to the ownership rights of Tony Vidler. Tony Vidler authorises you to make a single copy of the content herein for your own personal, non-commercial, use while visiting the site. You agree that any copy made must include the Tony Vidler copyright notice in full. No other permission is granted to you to print, copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, upload, download, store, display in public, alter, or modify the content contained on this web site.
RT @MichaelKitces Good discussion @mattsonnen_pfi about firms that get SO focused on revenue growth they lose sight of profitability. One of the hazards of valuing at multiples of revenue instead of profits: What RIAs should learn from Uber and Lyft investmentnews.com/article/20…